Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 2;15:154. doi: 10.1186/s12877-015-0155-4

Table 1.

PEDro scale rating [26]

Reference Eligibility criteria Random allocation Concealed allocation Group similar at baseline Blinded subjects Blinded therapist Blinded assessors Less than 15 % dropouts Intention-to-treat analysis Between-group comparisons Point measure and variability PEDro score
Binder 2005 [38] 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 6
Cadore 2014 [13] 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 7
Faber 2006 [32] 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 8
Fairhall 2014 [33] 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 7
Giné-Garriga 2010 [34] 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 8
Giné-Garriga 2013 [35] 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 8
Kim 2015 [37] 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 8
Latham 2003 [36] 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 8
Lustosa 2011 [31] 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 4
Total 8 9 7 7 0 0 7 8 9 9 8 7.1